Download E-books The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers PDF

By Will Durant

A super and concise account of the lives and ideas of the nice philosophers—Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Spinoza, Voltaire, Kant, Schopenhauer, Spencer, Nietzsche, Bergson, Croce, Russell, Santayana, James, and Dewey—The tale of Philosophy is one of many nice books of our time. Few write for the non-specialist in addition to Will Durant, and this booklet is a just right instance of his eminently readable scholarship. Durant’s perception and wit by no means stop to dazzle; The tale of Philosophy is a key publication for any reader who needs to survey the historical past and improvement of philosophical principles within the Western international.

Show description

Read or Download The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers PDF

Similar Biography books

Daphne Du Maurier and Her Sisters: The Hidden Lives of Piffy, Bird and Bing

Celebrated novelist Daphne Du Maurier and her sisters, eclipsed via her popularity, are published in all their impressive complexity during this riveting new biography. the center sister in a well-known inventive dynasty, Daphne du Maurier is without doubt one of the grasp storytellers of our time, writer of 'Rebecca', 'Jamaica resort' and 'My Cousin Rachel', and brief tales, 'Don't glance Now' and the terrifying 'The Birds' between many.

Caravaggio: Painter of Miracles (Eminent Lives)

“Matching stunning prose to stunning works of art, Prose responds to every picture as a second of theatrical revelation, sensual or religious, and regularly either. ” — Boston Sunday Globe In Caravaggio, ny instances bestselling writer Francine Prose (Goldengrove, analyzing like a author) bargains a charming account of the lifestyles and paintings of 1 of the best painters of all time.

She-Wolves: The Women Who Ruled England Before Elizabeth

“Helen Castor has a thrilling narrative gift. . . . Readers will love this e-book, discovering it totally soaking up and lucrative. ” —Hilary Mantel, Booker Prize-winning writer of Wolf Hall In the culture of Antonia Fraser, David Starkey, and Alison Weir, prize-winning historian Helen Castor supplies a compelling, eye-opening exam of girls and gear in England, witnessed in the course of the lives of six girls who exercised strength opposed to all odds—and one that by no means received the opportunity.

Additional resources for The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers

Show sample text content

104 yet John Smith infrequently handles his “table of kind of” so correctly, and extra most likely will proceed his mince pies regardless of the seismic disturbances of his decrease strata. or even have been John Smith so clever, it's going to now not shear Bacon of his benefit; for what does good judgment do yet formulate the adventure and strategies of the clever? —what does any self-discipline do yet test by means of ideas to show the paintings of some right into a technology teachable to all? yet is the formula Bacon’s personal? isn't the Socratic strategy inductive? isn't really Aristotle’s biology inductive? didn't Roger Bacon preparation in addition to pontificate the inductive strategy which Francis Bacon simply preached? didn't Galileo formulate greater the strategy that technology has really used? actual of Roger Bacon, much less actual of Galileo, much less actual but of Aristotle, least actual of Socrates. Galileo defined the purpose instead of the tactic of technological know-how, retaining up earlier than its fans the aim of mathematical and quantitative formula of all adventure and relationships! Aristotle practised induction whilst there has been not anything else for him to do, and the place the cloth didn't lend itself to his penchant for the deduction of particular conclusions from magnificently common assumptions; and Socrates didn't rather a lot preparation induction—the amassing of data—as analysis—the definition and discrimination of phrases and concepts. Bacon makes no declare to parthenogenetic originality; like Shakespeare he's taking with a lordly hand, and with a similar excuse, that he embellishes no matter what he touches. each guy has his assets, as each organism has its foodstuff; what's his is the way he digests them and turns them into flesh and blood. As Rawley places it, Bacon “contemned no man’s observations, yet may mild his torch at each man’s candle. ”105 yet Bacon recognizes those bills: he refers to “that worthwhile approach to Hippocrates,”106—so sending us without delay to the genuine resource of inductive common sense one of the Greeks; and “Plato,” he writes (where much less competently we write “Socrates”), “giveth stable instance of inquiry by means of induction and examine of details; even though in one of these wandering demeanour as is of no strength or fruit. ”107 He may have disdained to dispute his responsibilities to those predecessors; and we should always disdain to magnify them. yet nevertheless, is the Baconian strategy right? Is it the tactic such a lot fruitfully utilized in glossy technological know-how? No: typically, technological know-how has used, with top end result, now not the buildup of information (“natural history”) and their manipulation through the advanced tables of the Novum Organum, however the easier approach to speculation, deduction and test. So Darwin, analyzing Malthus’ Essay on inhabitants, conceived the assumption of making use of to all organisms the Malthusian speculation that inhabitants has a tendency to extend swifter than the technique of subsistence; deduced from this speculation the possible end that the strain of inhabitants at the food-supply ends up in a fight for lifestyles within which the fittest continue to exist, and during which in every one iteration each species is modified into nearer version to its setting; and at last (having via speculation and deduction restricted his challenge and his box of remark) grew to become to “the unwithered face of nature” and made for two decades a sufferer inductive exam of the proof.

Rated 4.47 of 5 – based on 5 votes